ReAbility Evidence and Regulatory Basis

1

International clinical guidelines

Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations: Virtual Stroke Rehabilitation

Virtual and hybrid rehabilitation models support home monitoring, patient activity, standardized assessment, privacy protection, and professional review of results when in-person services are limited or supplemented by remote support.

2

Ukrainian legislation

Закон України №1053-IX та Постанова КМУ №1462

Ukrainian rehabilitation legislation supports continuation of rehabilitation after discharge, IRP monitoring, goal review, and professional responsibility for therapy programs.

3

Clinical studies

Cramer et al., 2019

Home-based telerehabilitation compared with clinic-based therapy after stroke supports the relevance of structured home programs and remote contact with a therapist.

Chen et al., 2017

Home rehabilitation with tele-support is relevant to the model of home completion under professional supervision.

Grau-Pellicer et al., 2020

mHealth tools may support adherence to home activity after stroke, with caregiver assistance for some patients.

4

Systematic reviews

Systematic reviews describe telerehabilitation and remote monitoring as promising tools for access, adherence, activity, and follow-up, while emphasizing heterogeneous interventions and the need for validation in a specific context.

5

Which functions this supports

ReAbility functionSupported by
Home rehabilitation assignmentsRehabilitation guidelines and professional therapy programs
Task completion reportsIRP monitoring and adherence research
Questionnaires and PROMsAssessment recommendations and patient-reported outcomes
Professional review in the clinical dashboardMonitoring, reassessment, and follow-up workflow

6

Limitations

The listed sources do not prove that ReAbility itself already improves functional outcomes, reduces rehospitalizations, saves professional time, or is non-inferior to usual care. Such claims require pilot or clinical evaluation of the platform itself.